Download A Companion to Applied Ethics by R. G. Frey, Christopher Heath Wellman PDF

By R. G. Frey, Christopher Heath Wellman

Utilized or useful ethics may be the most important progress region in philosophy at the present time, and plenty of matters in ethical, social, and political lifestyles have come below philosophical scrutiny lately. Taken jointly, the essays during this quantity – together with evaluate essays on theories of ethics and the character of utilized ethics – offer a cutting-edge account of the main urgent ethical questions dealing with us this day.

  • Provides a complete advisor to a few of the most important difficulties of functional ethics
  • Offers cutting-edge money owed of concerns in scientific, environmental, felony, social, and company ethics
  • Written via significant philosophers almost immediately engaged with those complicated and profound moral issues

Show description

Read Online or Download A Companion to Applied Ethics PDF

Similar history & surveys books

Descartes' Natural Philosophy

Книга Descartes' common Philosophy Descartes' common Philosophy Книги Психология, философия Автор: S. Gaukroger Год издания: 2000 Формат: pdf Издат. :Routledge Страниц: 776 Размер: 6,1 ISBN: 0415219930 Язык: Английский0 (голосов: zero) Оценка:Possibly the main finished choice of essays on Descartes' clinical writings ever released, this quantity deals a close reassessment of his medical paintings and its concerning his philosophy.

Aquinas on the Twofold Human Good: Reason and Human Happiness in Aquina's Moral Science

For a few years, philosophers have learn Aquinas's moral writings as though his ethical doctrine should make experience thoroughly except the commitments of Christian religion. simply because Aquinas relied seriously upon rational arguments, and upon Aristotle specifically, students have often tried to learn his texts in a strictly philosophical context.

Primitive culture: researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, art, and custom

This can be a copy of a ebook released earlier than 1923. This booklet could have occasional imperfections resembling lacking or blurred pages, terrible photographs, errant marks, and so forth. that have been both a part of the unique artifact, or have been brought by means of the scanning approach. We think this paintings is culturally vital, and regardless of the imperfections, have elected to carry it again into print as a part of our carrying on with dedication to the upkeep of revealed works around the world.

Irrealism in Ethics

Irrealism in Ethics provides a suite of six unique essays contributed by way of trendy ethical philosophers that tackle a number of kinds of the philosophical place of moral irrealism.  Addresses a variety of kinds of the philosophical place of moral irrealism provides arguments either for and opposed to the 2 significant types of moral irrealism—the errors conception and expressivism deals leading edge new arguments on themes in terms of moral irrealism good points unique contributions from the world over favorite ethical philosophers

Additional info for A Companion to Applied Ethics

Sample text

New York: Columbia University Press Richardson H S (1990) Specifying norms as a way to resolve concrete ethical problems Philosophy and Public Affairs, 19: 279-310 (2000) Specifying balancing and interpreting bioethical principles Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 25: 285-307 Further reading Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (1996) Final Report. New York: Oxford University Press Altaian A (1983) Pragmatism and applied ethics American Philosophical Quarterly, 20: 227-35 Beauchamp T L and Childress J F (2001) Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th edn New York: Oxford University Press Brock D W (1987) Truth or consequences: the role of philosophers in policy-making Ethics, 97: 786-91 Daniels N (1996) Wide reflective equilibrium in practice In L W Sumner and J Boyle (eds) Philosophical Perspectives on Bioethics, pp 96-114 Toronto: University of Toronto Press DeGrazia D (1992) Moving forward in bioethical theory: theories cases and specified principlism Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 17: 511-39 15 TOM L BEAUCHAMP Dworkin R (1993) Life's Dominion: An Argument about Abortion Euthanasia and Individual Fd Feinberg J (1984-7) Th Ml Liit f th C i i l L 4 vols New York: Oxford University Press Freeman E and Werhane P (eds) (1997) Dictionary of Business Ethics Cambridge MA: Mthil hy 20: 222-34 Maclntyre A (1984) Does applied ethics rest on a mistake?

Or do these processes have a significance of their own that may be used as a basis for criticizing particular redistributive schemes? Maybe the economist who defends market processes as d i t i ffii l t h i i t i ill t t tht df t itii d i t i b t i h tht h ditt kt t O b ditibti b itiid l d f di th l i i b i l i t f i i t f d i t i th lb i f th t i t l t f th h llff M t f thi h t ill f th l th th th i t It is important however to understand that the two are related Market processes are not just valued instrumentally; economists do not normally advocate setting up any old allocative arrangements that happen to conduce to efficiency Markets are l d b thi titti t t bd i t t i i l f it l t Th f d t l l f kt "N t f itht t" d "K t t " l l i i l d t d t f ll ll ill h th iltd S it' tht lf ditibti d i t t lb kt th t t f kt i t i i ld j t i l i t it ft h t f l reproach as well for it is seeking implicitly to defend institutions that have inherent moral significance even apart from their outcomes Modern societies adopt two main redistributive strategies for mitigating the rigors f t F i t th id b f i d titi (f l bli d t i d i ti i l hlth ) t ll iti ti f t h i bilit t S d th id l i t ith i h i kid t l b f i i h d t h h f th t d th t t f h t d th diti h i h it i granted vary widely between societies and within societies over time Both types of provision raise interesting moral issues but I shall focus mainly on the second type 39 JEREMY WALDRON ft d i b d " l f " b it ditibti i l i t i evident In fact the extent of the redistribution involved in actuallyexisting welfare schemes is easy to exaggerate At the time of writing in the United States federal b d t t t d lf t i t l t t f d 6 t f t di S lt tk i l l fil ith h h l d i f ( ) $100000 b t 35 t f thi i f d l t Of t h t $35000 t f d f th f i l t th US T d 6 t i d t d t lf t f T t it th th fil i l i i d t tibt l lihtl th 2 t f it t t l household income to the poor (slightly more when state taxes and transfers are taken into account) Given the extent of poverty in the United States a 2 percent contribution from each of the most prosperous households must be regarded as a fil d t t Still th ti ti i i f i t t f ld d th l f $2000 ( ) i bb i l M d f d f lf ditibti ft i t i i th t t f d d th US t i l d th ll f h hih l l f ii f th l l f ii hih might well require a contribution two or three times greater than that currently paid by welloff American households We have to evaluate these proposals as well So how should we think about welfare from a moral point of view?

Or is the fact that an action would harm another person relevant to its being wrong in a way that harm to other species is not? Here again we cannot answer this question without taking a stand on meta-ethical issues concerning what morality and moral obligation are if only implicitly If we understand moral questions broadly enough then it may seem that harm is harm and is no less morally relevant whether the being harmed is a person or a snail darter If however we think of morality as a system of reciprocity or mutual accountability where norms of right and wrong mediate a moral community of free and equal moral persons then harm to other persons will seem to have an intrinsic moral relevance that harm to other species does not For then what is morally wrong will be what one can be held accountable by others for doing in accordance with norms that must in some sense be acceptable to all from a perspective of equality So viewed harm to persons is not simply harm to members of a certain species but harm to a member of the moral community to whom norms of right and wrong must be justifiable This is only one example of how questions of meta-ethics are implicitly involved in issues of normative ethical theory and therefore in case ethics Ultimately we have no alternative but to pursue philosophical ethics, that is to attempt to work out a comprehensive outlook that integrates normative ethics and meta-ethics (Darwall 1998) Contractarianism/Contractualism We can turn now to a review of different normative theories and begin with one that can be grounded in the meta-ethical theory of morality as reciprocity or mutual accountability just mentioned This is the idea that whether an action is right or wrong depends on whether it accords with or violates principles that would be the object of an agreement contract or choice made under certain conditions by members of the moral community The general idea can be developed in a variety of ways depending on how the choice or agreement the parties who make it and the conditions under which it is made are characterized One broad distinction is between contractarianism, under which the choice of moral principles is self-interested and contractualism, which grounds it in a moral ideal of reciprocity reasonableness or fairness It may seem strange to think that moral principles can in any respect be agreed upon or chosen How can a moral proposition be made true by any choice or agreement?

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.47 of 5 – based on 35 votes