By Richard K. Emmerson
Read or Download Antichrist in the Middle Ages: A Study of Medieval Apocalypticism, Art, and Literature PDF
Best theology books
During this ebook, Mark Johnston argues that God should be stored not just from the distortions of the "undergraduate atheists" (Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, and Sam Harris) yet, extra importantly, from the idolatrous trends of faith itself. each one monotheistic faith has its attribute methods of domesticating actual Divinity, of taming God's calls for so they don't noticeably threaten our self-love and fake righteousness.
How a faith in keeping with the sacredness of nature bargains with the matter of evil.
This e-book, newly revised and up-to-date, examines the japanese Church's theology of icons mainly at the foundation of the acta of the 7th Ecumenical Council of 787. The political conditions resulting in the outbreak of the iconclast controversy within the 8th century are mentioned intimately, however the major emphasis is at the theological arguments and assumptions of the council individuals.
A Christianity worthy Believing bargains an interesting, 'come-with-me-on-a-journey-of-exploring-the-possibilities' method of what it capacity to be a follower of Jesus in our day. Written by means of Doug Pagitt? a number one voice within the Emergent conversation—this superbly written e-book weaves jointly theological reflections, Christian background, and his personal tale of religion transformation.
- Christology of the Later Fathers (Library of Christian Classics)
- Las Cartas a los Corintios
- Is Nature Enough?: Meaning and Truth in the Age of Science
- An Interpretation of Religion: Human Responses to the Transcendent (2nd Edition)
Additional resources for Antichrist in the Middle Ages: A Study of Medieval Apocalypticism, Art, and Literature
Page 9 Objection 10 Nicholas raises an objection against his doctrine of the good. If a person makes a mistake, his act is not good. But Nicholas has taught that whatever exists is good. Now, how can the act be both good and not good? Nicholas' answer to this objection is that the act is good, absolutely speaking; that is, it is better for it to exist than not exist. Nicholas holds that the existence of whatever is is better than its non-existence, since otherwise everything in the universe would happen by chance.
Moreover, since Nicholas is not demon- Page 3 strating his own position but simply establishing its probability, he uses arguments which are not demonstrations and even defends positions which he believes to be false. He takes a set of propositions, which he need not necessarily accept as true, and defends them as more probable than their opposites. 5 First Prologue, Part One Nicholas thinks that the so-called "conclusions" of Aristotle and Averroes are not really demonstrated and that opposite conclusions can just as easily be drawn from the evidence.
For, if a point touches a point, it coincides with it. And, if the points in the magnitude do not touch each other, there is no continuum. Nicholas' answer is baffling. He thinks that it is possible for points to touch each other without coinciding because two points can touch with each retaining its own different position. Yet he does not really explain how this is possible. Objection 3 Another difficulty is raised by Algazel. If two circles of different radii move together around a common centre, when the large circumference has moved one point, the small circumference has moved through a fraction of a point.