By John A. Keller
John Keller offers a collection of latest essays on ontology, time, freedom, God, and philosophical process. Our knowing of those topics has been drastically complicated, because the Nineteen Seventies, via the paintings of Peter van Inwagen. during this quantity top philosophers interact together with his paintings, and van Inwagen himself bargains selective responses.
summary: John Keller offers a collection of latest essays on ontology, time, freedom, God, and philosophical strategy. Our realizing of those matters has been significantly complex, because the Nineteen Seventies, by means of the paintings of Peter van Inwagen. during this quantity prime philosophers have interaction along with his paintings, and van Inwagen himself deals selective responses
Read or Download Being, freedom, and method: themes from the philosophy of Peter Van Inwagen PDF
Similar metaphysics books
In his magnum opus, the ancient and significant Dictionary, Pierre Bayle provided a chain of amazing criticisms of the most important philosophical and theological platforms of the seventeenth Century. even if formally skeptical about the try and offer a definitive account of the truths of metaphysics, there's cause to work out Bayle as a reluctant skeptic.
During this compelling paintings, Peter Lopston presents an available exploration of the most important themes in metaphysics. He considers difficulties resembling essence, life, substance, goal, area, time, brain, causality, God, freedom and the probabilities of immortality. additionally, he seems to be on the significant ancient metaphysical platforms and defends the metaphysical venture as an entire.
Those lectures, given in 2014 on the „Càtedra Walter Benjamin“, learn the philosophical kinfolk among of the best sleek German philosophers, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and Walter Benjamin. it's proven what shut connections specially Benjamin’s Epistemo-Critical Prologue has to a few basic elements of Hegel’s metaphysics and epistemology.
- The Structure of the World: Metaphysics and Representation
- Philosophical Papers: Volume One
- New Essays on the Rationalists
- The Invention of Time and Space: Origins, Definitions, Nature, Properties
- An Introductory Philosophy of Medicine: Humanizing Modern Medicine (Philosophy and Medicine) (Philosophy and Medicine)
- The problem of universals in contemporary philosophy
Additional resources for Being, freedom, and method: themes from the philosophy of Peter Van Inwagen
If, on the other hand, one is a reductive physicalist, one will hold that what are fundamental are the sorts of fully determinate universals posited by our best physics, and dualists will likely posit universals of both sorts. In short, the universals posited by a constituent theory will be limited to those fully determinate ﬁrst order universals that are required to yield what its practitioners take to be the ultimate nature or character of familiar particulars. But while they have different conceptions of that character, defenders of constituent theories all tend to understand character in causal terms.
Accordingly, they insist that very few predicate terms carry ontological force—only those expressing the contents required to invest familiar particulars with the character they have. They call those contents basic or fundamental universals; they tell us that these universals are one and all fully determinate ﬁrst order universals; and since they endorse the Principle of Instantiation, they limit their basic or fundamental universals to fully determinate ﬁrst order universals that actually are (now or tenselessly) immanent in or constituents of some concrete particular.
1953), ‘The Elements of Being: I’, in Review of Metaphysics 7, 3–18. Wolterstorff, N. (1970), ‘Bergmann’s Constituent Ontology’, in Noûs 4, 109–34. Wolterstorff, N. (1973), On Universals (University of Chicago Press). Wolterstorff, N. (1991), ‘Divine Simplicity’, in Philosophical Perspectives 5, 531–52. 2 A One Category Ontology L. A. Paul An ontology is deﬁned by its fundamental categories. Following Peter van Inwagen (2011), take divisions between fundamental categories to mark “real divisions between things” that determine the basic categorical structure of the world.